Welcome to the Age of Mistrust . . . a time when people question the truth of what they read and doubt the integrity of those they meet. It’s an era in which skepticism has replaced faith and in which consumers are not surprised when a trusted advisor becomes a scoundrel. As you can imagine, doing business in this environment can be tough. But if you take steps to build and preserve trust, you can survive—and even thrive. This article will show you how.
But first it’s important to understand how we got to where we are today. Back in the 1950s, Americans trusted their institutions of government and business. When leaders spoke, people had no reason to doubt them. But along came Viet Nam, Watergate, the corporate ethics scandals of the 1990s, the second Iraq War, and the 2008 economic meltdown. Consumers who used to believe in politicians, corporate executives, and financial advisers lost faith in them.
Consumer trust took another blow during the 2016 U.S. presidential election, when, according to multiple U.S. intelligence agencies, Russia spread false content across social media in order to sow dissension and mistrust in America’s system of government. In the election’s aftermath, the term “fake news” arose to describe not only Russian efforts, but also those of anyone who made false claims for personal gain.
Which brings us to today and what Edelman, a global marketing communications firm, calls America’s trust crisis. According to Edelman’s Trust Barometer, trust among informed U.S., citizens fell dramatically from 64 in 2016 to 42 in 2017, a drop of 22 points. This made America the lowest of 28 countries surveyed. Edelman says its Trust Index reflects the average percentage of individuals who said they trust their government, political institutions, media, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Edelman also pointed to declining trust among the general population, which fell nine points to 43. This put the United States in the bottom quartile of the 28 countries surveyed.
Why such a dramatic drop in public trust? Edelman says it resulted from a staggering lack of faith in the U.S. government. According to its survey, people’s trust in government fell 14 points in one year—to 33 percent among the general population. It declined 30 points to 33 percent among citizens who are well informed. The other three institutions had trust drops of between 20 to 20 percent. CEO Richard Edelman, said the plunges represent “an unprecedented crisis of trust . . . (linked to a) lack of objective facts and rational discourse.”
In the financial-services industry, mistrust is also a lingering side effect of the fraudulent mortgage loan practices that sparked 2008’s global economic meltdown. Business practices and regulations that lead consumers to question advisor motives haven’t helped. For example, a recent CFA Institute survey revealed that only 35 percent of retail investors believed their advisors always put their interests ahead of their own. Another 49 percent said advisors usually did, while 16 percent said they sometimes, rarely, or never did. High levels of doubt are the product of complex compensation models and confusing regulations that leave consumers wondering whose side their advisors are really on.
Worse, 84 percent of investors said advisors needed to fully disclose their fees in order to be trustworthy. Yet only 48 percent of consumers said their advisor did so. Another trust gap occurred on the issue of conflicts of interest. The CFA survey found that 80 percent of consumers said they expected full conflict disclosure, but only 43 percent were getting it.
Further confounding trust, investment publications apparently have adopted the practice of publishing articles from “objective” journalists that are actually just advertisements in disguise. Case in point: the SEC recently charged 27 individuals and entities (Seeking Alpha, Forbes, The Street, Yahoo Finance, The Motley Fool, and more) for publishing bullish articles about biotech investments that were just advertisements. In effect, investment publications blatantly published “fake news” in order to flog stock sales, leaving consumers to question the integrity of many financial-news outlets.
And let’s not forget Bernie Madoff, who perpetrated the largest investment fraud in history, valued at $64.8 billion. When Madoff pleaded guilty to 11 federal felonies in 2009, receiving a 150-year prison sentence, he prompted millions of investors to wonder whether they could still trust their own advisors.
The point of this litany? That the trust deficit in financial services has been simmering for decades. Today, financial professionals may see growing mistrust play out in their businesses in the form of prospect resistance to granting appointments or clients not following recommendations. Are you facing these problems and if so, what should you do about it? The answer is clear: Work hard to make sure your published claims (words) and professionalism (actions) are beyond reproach. Let’s take a closer look at what this involves.
A published claim is anything you say online or offline, in any medium (website, brochure, podcast, archived webinar, etc.). Because of the Internet, you should consider such claims to be permanent. In other words, they will be accessible to your prospects and clients forever because of the archiving and search capability of the Web. This is a game-changer for two reasons. First, the Internet makes it easy for consumers to fact check your statements. If you make false claims, you will be exposed for lying. Second, your lies will be highly visible to millions of people, many of whom will feel compelled to share what they learned about you, which will compound the harm to your reputation.
To make sure your public claims are accurate, screen them to eliminate what advisor coach Matt Oechsli calls blatant lies, white lies, and lies of omission.
Since clients are on high alert due to the fake-news threat, Oechli warns that a single lie can demolish the trust you took years to establish. To prevent this, he advocates “truth checking” every element of your business, including . . .
The claims you make about your products and services are especially crucial, as are the statements you make about business or economic trends. Unlike people who are publishing fabricated articles on the Internet to generate clicks and revenue, you are legally prohibited from “making stuff up.” Here are some things you can do to avoid publishing falsehoods:
Having bulletproof content is important. But so is having a website that reinforces your believability. According to Jack Waymire, founder of Paladin Research & Registry, one of the best ways to boost your credibility is to be highly transparent to your clients. That means factually describing every source of competence: schooling, industry work experience, professional designations, and association memberships. While doing this, don’t fall prey to the temptation of hyping or overstating your credentials. Just provide the facts and let people draw their own conclusions. The more you shamelessly tout yourself, the less credible you will seem.
According to Waymire, establishing your expertise is just the beginning. You also want to demonstrate your commitment to ethical business practices. He recommends taking the following steps:
Other things you can do on your website to promote credibility:
Once you’ve established your credibility, now you have to convince people you’re a professional. This goes way beyond just looking the part. It cuts to the core of how you discharge your duties and how you relate to your clients as a fellow human being. Experts say three characteristics are necessary before people will consider you to be a real pro: reliability, intimacy, and client orientation.
By focusing on the three factors above, not only will you enhance your client relationships and build trust, you will also build long-term good will. That means your clients will be more likely to give you a second chance if you put out “fake news” by mistake, not to mention remain your clients for many years to come.
Sources: